5,389
edits
m (→2nd Vote For New Main Page: I can't decide. Both are good.) |
m (→2nd Vote For New Main Page: beyond) |
||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
;?P. | ;?P. | ||
:Ooh... I can't decide. Both are good. Seems that we have to wait for some more opinions... | :Ooh... I can't decide. Both are good. Seems that we have to wait for some more opinions... | ||
::[[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 12:34, 5 February 2008 (CET) | |||
---- | |||
==Beyond the vote== | |||
:@geyser: The table doesn't look good in 1440x900. I suggest either to put the table into another table or to put the content of the last row into separate tables and center these. Also I don't like the look of the part above the table (introduction, welcome pic). That should be polished somehow. | :@geyser: The table doesn't look good in 1440x900. I suggest either to put the table into another table or to put the content of the last row into separate tables and center these. Also I don't like the look of the part above the table (introduction, welcome pic). That should be polished somehow. | ||
::[[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 12:34, 5 February 2008 (CET) | |||
:[[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 12:34, 5 February 2008 (CET) | :As for both layouts being good, my suggestion was to keep them both. Iritscen's can go either below the table or on a separate page (like a site map). | ||
:As for the looks in 1440x900, I'm not sure what you mean. If you object to the lists being flushed left in wide table columns, then I kinda disagree. | |||
:If you embed the lists into centered sub-tables, the width of those will be depend on the content, so it will be different for the three columns... | |||
:IMO, left-aligned lists are OK and anything else will look worse. Might be wrong. Anyway, you are free to polish anything you feel like polishing. | |||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 14:39, 5 February 2008 (CET) |