18,700
edits
m (→Beyond the vote: typo) |
|||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
:I also think it's quite appropriate not to enforce scholarly objectivity in the articles. As long as "personal essays" and occasional wacky stuff do their job, let them be. | :I also think it's quite appropriate not to enforce scholarly objectivity in the articles. As long as "personal essays" and occasional wacky stuff do their job, let them be. | ||
:Bring in organization if you like, but spare us the tedious bits. In other words: take the "fun" out of "functionality", and I might buy myself some extra guts, my [[friend]] ^_^ | :Bring in organization if you like, but spare us the tedious bits. In other words: take the "fun" out of "functionality", and I might buy myself some extra guts, my [[friend]] ^_^ | ||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 23:09, 4 February 2008 (CET) | ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 23:09, 4 February 2008 (CET)<br> | ||
::Perhaps you noticed my bringing in a template, huh? :-) Don't worry, I am not going to be a wiki-Nazi who insists on WP-style writing everywhere. I am all for some whimsicality in this wiki. But at the start, it seems to me that the wiki was basically your baby, and while I don't want to take it away from you (not that I could, Mr. Admin!), if we don't open it up for others to contribute, it can't represent the community as a whole. But if an article is written in 1st person, then it naturally makes anyone else hesitant to touch it, so they can't contribute. That was the purpose behind the template. | |||
::I'm sure you won't mind others taking some of the burden off your shoulders and helping you finish up the wiki; I just want to assure you that that's really my only goal in everything I do here. I also don't intend to put every single thing up to a vote; it's just that the Main Page is an important matter and I think we need input on what design would be most user-friendly. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 15:28, 5 February 2008 (CET) | |||
==2nd Vote For New Main Page== | ==2nd Vote For New Main Page== |