User talk:Geyser: Difference between revisions

new images question
(new images question)
Line 162: Line 162:
:Obviously not (have a look at the history). --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 21:02, 20 February 2008 (CET)
:Obviously not (have a look at the history). --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 21:02, 20 February 2008 (CET)
::Well, now that it's deleted, I can't, but that's okay, I just wanted it gone if it was useless, and it is now, so I'm happy. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 15:44, 21 February 2008 (CET)
::Well, now that it's deleted, I can't, but that's okay, I just wanted it gone if it was useless, and it is now, so I'm happy. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 15:44, 21 February 2008 (CET)
---
=Images organization=
I noticed you are still opposed to having subpages under Images. I am not arguing here, I just want to know why you feel that way. I do realize now that by making them subpages, they aren't counted in the wiki stats as pages. But the reason I supported making them subpages is that they are pages consisting entirely of images. There's no textual content, so it's not an article. They're just lists of images that would have been one long page called Images, but we broke them out to make it look better. Wouldn't it be weird to take a page like Images/Jokes and make that a page called Jokes?  Just a bunch of images? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 18:18, 27 February 2008 (CET)