Restless Souls/Research/War/Propaganda: Difference between revisions

From OniGalore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (marked dead link (archive.org copy is missing video))
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
"Die größten Triumphe der Propaganda wurden nicht durch Handeln, sondern durch Unterlassung erreicht. Groß ist die Wahrheit, größer aber, vom praktischen Gesichtspunkt, ist das Verschweigen der Wahrheit." - Aldous Huxley, [[wp:de:Sch%C3%B6ne_neue_Welt|Schöne neue Welt]] (1932), aus dem Vorwort (1946)
"The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth." - Aldous Huxley, [[wp:Brave_New_World|Brave New World]] (1932), from the foreword (1946)


==Propaganda==
==Propaganda==


==Gleichschaltung==
==[[wp:Gleichschaltung|Gleichschaltung]]==


==Zensur==
==Censorship==


==Vorkommnisse in Demokratien==
==Occurances in democracies==
Propaganda in Diktaturen ist schon fast selbsterklärend. Viel interessanter sind die Grautöne in Demokratien und ihre Gründe.
Propaganda in dictatorships is almost self-explanatory. The shades of gray in democracies and their reasons are much more interesting.


Propaganda, Gleichschaltung und Zensur passieren meist gleichzeitig. Bei Autokratien in Kriegszeiten ist dies geradezu garantiert.
Propaganda, Gleichschaltung and censorship usually happen at the same time. In wartime autocracies, this is almost guaranteed.


In Friedenszeiten entfällt die Gleichschaltung - zumindest in '''Demokratien. Propaganda und Zensur treten dort meist nur unterschwellig auf.''' Übergänge wiederum können fließend sein - so wie ein Staat (bzw. eine hypothetische WCG) eine Mischform aus Demokratie und Autokratie (Diktatur) sein kann: Zunächst eine '''[[wp:de:Demokratieindex_(The_Economist)|unvollständige]] und schließlich [[wp:de:Defekte_Demokratie|defekte Demokratie]]'''. Siehe auch: [[wp:de:Narco-Staat|Narco-Staaten]].
In peacetime, there is no Gleichschaltung - at least in democracies. Propaganda and censorship usually only appear subliminally there.''' Transitions, in turn, can be fluid - just as a state (or a hypothetical WCG) can be a mixed form of democracy and autocracy (dictatorship): First of all, a '''[[wp:The_Economist_Democracy_Index|incomplete]] and finally [[wp:Defective_democracy|defective democracy]]'''. See also: [[wp:Narco-state|Narco-state]].


Wie auch echte Verschwörungen, größer angelegte Vertuschungen und ähnliches - siehe Watergate - sind auch harte Propaganda und Zensur in echten Demokratien möglich - aber zum Glück selten.
Like real conspiracies, large-scale cover-ups and the like - see Watergate - harsh propaganda and censorship are also possible in real democracies - but fortunately rare.


Um dem Staat bei der Selbstkorrektur zu helfen, sehen sich Vertreter der Qualitätsmedien auch als "[https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/lexika/das-junge-politik-lexikon/321342/vierte-gewalt/ Vierte] [[wp:de:Vierte_Gewalt|Gewalt]]".
In order to help the state correct itself, representatives of the quality media also see themselves as "[https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/lexika/das-junge-politik-lexikon/321342/vierte-gewalt/ Vierte] [[wp:Fourth_Estate|Fourth Estate]]".


Regierungen versuchen manchmal wiederum Reporter an sie kurze Leine zu nehmen. Siehe auch: [[wp:de:Embedded_Journalism|Embedded journalism]]. [https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199891580.001.0001/acref-9780199891580-e-6200 pool reporting], kritisch thematisiert in der Dokumentation "[[wp:de:Why_We_Fight_(2005)|Why We Fight]]" (2005)
Some governments, in turn, try to keep reporters on a short leash. See also: [[wp:de:Embedded_Journalism|Embedded journalism]]. [https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199891580.001.0001/acref-9780199891580-e-6200 pool reporting], critically discussed in the documentation "[[wp:de:Why_We_Fight_(2005)|Why We Fight]]" (2005)
 
:"You can fool all people for some time.
:You can fool a few people for all time.
:But you cannot fool all people all the time." - Ein Community-Mitglied


===Agenda-Setting===
===Agenda-Setting===
Abstufungen:
Levels sorted by relevance:
* '''Staatspropaganda''' durch (Staats-)Medien, Beeinflussung der Rechtsprechung und Bildungswesen, Behinderung/Verächtlichmachung der Opposition
* '''State propaganda''' by (state) media, influencing jurisprudence and education, obstructing/disparaging the opposition
** Türkei, Erdogan
** Türkiye, Erdogan
*** Zudem wurden [https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article173440415/Repressive-Politik-Erdogans-kalter-Sieg-ueber-die-Kurden.html Inländische] und [https://www.fr.de/politik/tuerkei-erdogan-kurden-der-krieg-im-abseits-92674047.html ausländische Kurden] immer wieder als Ablenkung und Sündenböcke missbraucht.
*** In addition, [https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article173440415/Repressive-Politik-Erdogans-kalter-Sieg-ueber-die-Kurden.html Domestic] and [https://www.fr.de/politik/tuerkei-erdogan-kurden-der-krieg-im-abseits-92674047.html foreign Kurds] are repeatedly abused as a distraction and scapegoats.
*** Vorgehen gegen Richter und [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/can-atalay-erdo-an-greift-verfassungsgericht-an-19306038.html Verfassungsrichter]
*** Action against judges and [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/can-atalay-erdo-an-greift-verfassungsgericht-an-19306038.html constitutional judges]
*** Nach einem [[wp:de:Putschversuch_in_der_T%C3%BCrkei_2016|Putschversuch 2016]] gab es eine zwielichtige [https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/nach-dem-putschversuch-in-der-tuerkei-mehr-als-100-000-menschen-von-erdogans-saeuberungswelle-betroffen-1.3126220 politische Säuberung].  
*** After a [[wp:2016_Turkish_coup_attempt|Putsch attempted 2016]] there was a Shady more than 100,000 people affected by Erdogan's wave of [https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/nach-dem-putschversuch-in-der-tuerkei-mehr-als-100-000-menschen-von-erdogans-saeuberungswelle-betroffen-1.3126220 political cleansing].
** USA, Trump
** USA, Trump
*** Hetzerischer Populismus, Verbreitung von Fake News und Verschwörungstheorien. Trumps Kommunikationsmittel der Wahl waren allerdings Twitter und Fox News.
*** Inciting populism, spread of fake news and conspiracy theories. However, Trump's means of communication of choice were Twitter and Fox News.
*** Hat den wütenden [[wp:de:Sturm_auf_das_Kapitol_in_Washington_2021|Mob am Capitol]] erst zu spät zurückgepfiffen. Nutzt seit dem die Lüge von der gestohlenen Wahl.
*** Whistled back to the angry [[wp:January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack|Mob at the Capitol]] too late. Since then, he has been using the lie about the stolen election.
*** Für seine zweite Amtszeit hat Trump bereits eine politische Säuberung - Project 2025, Schedule F - geplant und würde diese vermutlich mit der Erzählung des Deep States und erneuten Anspielungen auf angebliche Korruptionsbekämpfung flankieren. (''Den Sumpf in Washington trocken legen.'')
*** Trump has already planned a political purge - Project 2025, Schedule F - for his second term in office and would probably accompany it with the Deep State narrative and renewed allusions to alleged anti-corruption. ("Draining the swamp in Washington.")
*** Setzte die konservativen Verfassungsrichter Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh und Amy Coney Barrett durch ...
*** Imposed conservative constitutional judges Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
** Polen, Kaczyński
** Poland, Kaczyński
*** [[wp:de:Polnische_Verfassungskrise_und_Justizreformen_(seit_2015)|Umbau von Justiz]] und Medien durch die PIS, [https://www.tagesspiegel.de/internationales/abwicklung-der-offentlichen-medien-polens-kampf-gegen-die-pis-propaganda-10998946.html Rückbau ist/war schwierig]
*** [[wp:Polish_Constitutional_Tribunal_crisis_(2015_–_ongoing)|Restructuring of the judiciary]] and media through the PIS, [https://www.tagesspiegel.de/internationales/abwicklung-der-offentlichen-medien-polens-kampf-gegen-die-pis-propaganda-10998946.html Dismantling is/was difficult]
** Ungarn, Orban
** Hungary, Orban
** Italien, Berlusconi
** Italy, Berlusconi
* ''Normales'' Agenda-Setting (Politik via Medien)
* ''Normal'' agenda setting (politics via media)
** Propaganda ''Lite-Edition'': '''Populismus'''
** Propaganda ''Lite Edition'': '''Populism'''
* Eigenes Agenda-Setting einiger Medienhäusern:
* Some media companies’ own agenda setting:
** Schlicht als Absicht oder angeblich als Korrektur zur Agenda der Konkurrenz.
** Simply as an intention or supposedly as a correction to the competition's agenda.
** Teils ist das auch eine Eigendynamik:
** This is partly a dynamic of its own:
*** Herausbildung eines gewissen ''Team-Spirit'' (Korpsgeist) als Subspektrum innerhalb des größeren [[wp:de:Politisches_Spektrum|Links-Rechts-Spektrums]].
*** Development of a certain ''team spirit'' (esprit de corps) as a subspectrum within the larger [[wp:Political_spectrum|Left-Right-Spectrum]].
*** Schwerpunktsetzung durch Nischenbedienung. -- Im Allgemeinem wird die verschiedenartige politische Ausrichtung und Schwerpunktsetzung (die Gründe dessen mal beiseite gestellt) als Bereicherung angesehen.
*** Setting priorities through niche service. -- In general, the diverse political orientation and focus (the actual reasons for this put aside) is seen as an enrichment.
* [[wp:de:Haltungsjournalismus|Haltungsjournalismus]] -- Anscheinend geht ein Teil der Kritik am Haltungsjournalismus auf eine Erzählung im rechten Spektrum zurück. Die Themensetzung progressiver Vertreter wird als Versuch einer Bevormundung wahrgenommen bzw. sie wird als solche diffamiert. Das entspricht AfD-Denkmustern. Gleichzeitig werden manche Themen nicht kritisch genug hinterfragt, sodass vorgefertigte Meinungen Recherchen abkürzen können. So zog auch Claus Kleber eine [https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article235929216/Claus-Kleber-Ideologie-vergiftet-den-Journalismus.html gemischte Bilanz]. -- In der Quintessenz: Die Progressiven sind etwas zu unkritisch bei Migration und Integration und die Konservativen sind zu hypersensibel bei grünen Themen.
* [[wp:de:Haltungsjournalismus|Attitude journalism]] -- Apparently some of the criticism of attitude journalism stems from a narrative on the right-wing spectrum. The setting of topics by progressive representatives is perceived as an attempt at paternalism or is defamed as such. This corresponds to AfD thought patterns. At the same time, some topics are not examined critically enough, so that preconceived opinions can shorten research. Claus Kleber also drew a [https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article235929216/Claus-Kleber-Ideologie-vergiftet-den-Journalismus.html mixed conclusion]. -- The bottom line: The progressives are a little too uncritical when it comes to migration and integration and the conservatives are too hypersensitive when it comes to green issues.


===Eigendynamik===
===Self-running dynamics===
* Ausblenden von Fakten wegen eigenem Bias oder eigener Bubble oder "Ideologie".
* Hiding facts because of your own bias or bubble or "ideology".
* Diskrepanz: Die öffentliche Meinung weicht etwas von der "veröffentlichten Meinung" ab. (Precht und Welzer)
* Discrepancy: Public opinion differs somewhat from "published opinion". (Precht and Welzer)
* Deutschlands minimale Linkslage, deren Symptom die Gleichsetzung von rechts mit rechtsextrem ist. -- Allerdings ist die AfD-Erzählung von der linksgrün versifften Lügenpresse und der Meinungsdiktatur wiederum eine maßlose Übertreibung zwecks populistischer Hetze.
* Germany's minimal left-wing position, the symptom of which is the equation of the right with right-wing extremism. -- However, the AfD story about the "left-green filthy" ("linksgrünversiffte") "lying press" ("Lügenpresse") and the "opinion dictatorship" is again a massive exaggeration for the purpose of populist agitation.


===Cancel Culture===
===Cancel Culture===
Im Internetzeitalter fürchten sich viele staatliche und öffentliche Akteure vor digitalen Shitstorms und öffentlichen Empörungswellen. Die ''Interessenvertreter'' können politische wie auch rein wirtschaftliche Motive haben.
In the Internet age, many state and public actors are afraid of digital shitstorms and waves of public outrage. The “interest representatives” can have political as well as purely economic motives.


* https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/tv/jan-boehmermann-hat-nichts-falsch-gemacht-kritik-an-loeschung-von-zdf-magazin-royale-folge-a-f6b67453-3f8b-49f1-beff-a00835b3a451
* https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/tv/jan-boehmermann-hat-nichts-falsch-gemacht-kritik-an-loeschung-von-zdf-magazin-royale-folge-a-f6b67453-3f8b-49f1-beff-a00835b3a451


===Zensur zwecks Diplomatie oder Schutz nationaler "Interessen"===
===Censorship for the purpose of diplomacy or protection of national "interests"===
Vermutung:
Supposition:
* YouTube-Variante der ARTE-Dokumentation Kampf um Airbus
* YouTube variant of  ARTE documentation Battle for Airbus<!--Kampf um Airbus-->
** Auf YouTube wurde das Video gesperrt, während es auf der ARTE-Webseite noch abrufbar war.
** The video was blocked on YouTube while it was still available on the ARTE website. -- At June 26th, 2024, the up-time of the video ended properly.
*** [https://web.archive.org/web/20230620150809/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW7PiY0FCkc https://web.archive.org/web/20230620150809/'''https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW7PiY0FCkc''']
*** [https://web.archive.org/web/20230620150809/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW7PiY0FCkc https://web.archive.org/web/20230620150809/'''https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW7PiY0FCkc''']
*** <nowiki>https://www.arte.tv/de/videos/093798-000-A/der-kampf-um-airbus/</nowiki> (dead link)
*** <nowiki>https://www.arte.tv/de/videos/093798-000-A/der-kampf-um-airbus/</nowiki> (dead link)
* Nachträgliche Zensur eines Beitrags in der Mediathek, der zuvor millionenfach gesehen wurde... André Wüstner bei den ARD Tagesthemen: "Und es geht darum, dass wir auch weiterhin in Frieden und Freiheit leben wollen. Und wer das nicht versteht, der sollte momentan keine politische Verantwortung tragen." - Kontext: BK wollte die Tage die Taurus-Debatte am liebsten unter den Teppich kehren. Außerdem haben Frankreich und Deutschland ein zerstrittenes Bild abgegeben. Öffentlicher Schlagabtausch. Beim Treffen des Weimarer Dreiecks hieß es dann wieder man sei geschlossen. - Die Archive des Kreml wird man zwar nicht zensieren können. Aber egal...
* Subsequent censorship of an archived broadcast in the media library that had previously been seen millions of times. The video link was only accessible when one knew what to search for. André Wüstner on ARD Tagesthemen: "And it's about us wanting to continue to live in peace and freedom. And anyone who doesn't understand that shouldn't at the moment bear political responsibility." - Context: The German Chancellor wanted to sweep the Taurus debate under the carpet those days. In addition, France and Germany presented a conflicted picture: A public exchange of verbal attacks. At the Weimar Triangle meeting, an attempt was made to show demonstrative unity again all the more.


===Dilemmata durch Sicherheitsfragen===
===Security dilemmas===
* Dealing with [[wp:de:Whistleblower|Whistleblowers]]. See: Snowden and Assange.
* Dealing with [[wp:de:Whistleblower|Whistleblowers]]. See: Snowden and Assange.
** Despite all the mistakes now broken Assange has made in protecting sources, it would be a good thing for the democratic USA to '''show autocrat Putin the diplomatic middle finger''' and, in an act of humanity, stop the prosecution of Assange on the next anniversary of Navalny's death. -- Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, drafter and signer of the Declaration of Independence, [[wp:Polymath|Polymath]]: "Critics are our friends. They show us our faults."  
** Despite all the mistakes now broken Assange has made in protecting sources, it would be a good thing for the democratic USA to '''show autocrat Putin the diplomatic middle finger''' and, in an act of humanity, stop the prosecution of Assange on the next anniversary of Navalny's death. -- Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, drafter and signer of the Declaration of Independence, [[wp:Polymath|Polymath]]: "Critics are our friends. They show us our faults." -- In July 2024, the US government and [[wp:Julian_Assange|Assange]] agreed on a deal. However, a short time later, Biden's quasi pre-election campaign was overshadowed by debates about his age.
 
Tolerance paradox:
* Censorship against increasing fake news from domestic and foreign actors.
** Systematic exploitation of freedom of expression.
*** Individual statements can be based on the Basic Law. '''However, the situation changes when those statements are part of inflammatory propaganda or discriminatory ideology that despises people or the state.''' -- Or even contain hidden calls for violence. -- [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/thomas-haldenwang-meinungsfreiheit-ist-kein-freibrief-fuer-verfassungsfeinde-19623960.html Haldenwang] [https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/meinungsfreiheit-ist-kein-freibrief-haldenwang-wehrt-sich-gegen-kritik-am-verfassungsschutz-11449871.html made] a similar statement in the Maaßen case. In addition, the end of 2023 / beginning of 2024 was preceded by other events: parts of the German farmers' protests were infiltrated by lateral thinkers. (Some of these were in turn incited by right-wing extremists and Russian propaganda.) The ambush and intimidation of politicians was organized in chat groups. [https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/attacke-auf-robert-habeck-in-schluettsiel-wer-hat-die-bauern-aufgestachelt-a-aac02c64-96b4-4184-b4c3-dcac3896adce Requests peppered with seemingly harmless irony were enough]: "ACHTUNG !! Robert Harbeck (sic!) lädt heute zum Bürgerdialog um 16:45 Uhr im Fährhafen Schlüttsiel ein ! Er wünscht sich unendlich viel Interesse. Tun wir ihm den Gefallen und kommen mit allem was Räder hat ! Heute 16:45 Uhr Schlüttsiel !!!!!!"
** Democracies' own claim to be open makes them vulnerable: physically, economically, informationally. Open information and discussions can play into the hands of opponents of the system (autocracies). -- Freedom versus security is a recurring theme. Especially in the area of ​​cryptography. Please refer: [[wp:Crypto_Wars|Crypto Wars]], [[wp:TrueCrypt|TrueCrypt]], active infiltration: breaking TPM, SSL, state withholding of security-relevant bugs for hacking, [[wp:Pegasus_(spyware)|Pegasus]], [[wp:de:Staatstrojaner|Staatstrojaner]]. -- Secret services usually only disclose bugs to the public when major damage to governments and economies is foreseeable.


Toleranzparadox:
Ultimately, a "defensive democracy" must be able to survive both conventional and hybrid attacks - be they internal or external. If it doesn't do that, its self-defense wasn't strong enough.
* Zensur gegen zunehmende Fake-News von inländischen und ausländischen Akteure.
** Systematische Ausnutzung der Meinungsfreiheit.
*** Einzelne Aussagen können auf der Basis des Grundgesetzes stehen. '''Allerdings verändert sich die Lage, wenn jene Aussagen Teil einer hetzerischen bzw. Mensch oder Staat verächtlich machenden Propaganda oder diskriminierenden Ideologie sind.''' -- Oder auch verdeckte Gewaltaufrufe beinhalten. -- [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/thomas-haldenwang-meinungsfreiheit-ist-kein-freibrief-fuer-verfassungsfeinde-19623960.html Haldenwang] [https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/meinungsfreiheit-ist-kein-freibrief-haldenwang-wehrt-sich-gegen-kritik-am-verfassungsschutz-11449871.html äußerte] sich im Fall Maaßen ähnlich. Zudem gingen dem Ende 2023 / Anfang 2024 weiter Ereignisse voraus: Teile der deutschen Bauernproteste waren von Querdenkern unterwandert. (Einige dieser waren wiederum von Rechtsextremen und russischer Propaganda angestachelt.) Das Auflauern und Einschüchtern von Politikern wurde in Chatgruppen organisiert. [https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/attacke-auf-robert-habeck-in-schluettsiel-wer-hat-die-bauern-aufgestachelt-a-aac02c64-96b4-4184-b4c3-dcac3896adce Dazu reichten schon mit vermeintlich harmloser Ironie gespickte Aufforderungen]: "ACHTUNG !! Robert Harbeck (sic!) lädt heute zum Bürgerdialog um 16:45 Uhr im Fährhafen Schlüttsiel ein ! Er wünscht sich unendlich viel Interesse. Tun wir ihm den Gefallen und kommen mit allem was Räder hat ! Heute 16:45 Uhr Schlüttsiel !!!!!!"
** Eigener Anspruch von Demokratien offen zu sein, macht sie angreifbar: physisch, wirtschaftlich, informationell. Offene Informationen und Diskussionen können Systemgegnern (Autokratien) in die Karten spielen. -- Dabei ist '''Freiheit versus Sicherheit''' ein immer wiederkehrendes Thema. Besonders auch im Bereich Kryptographie. Siehe: [[wp:Crypto_Wars|Crypto Wars]], [[wp:TrueCrypt|TrueCrypt]], aktive Infiltration: Aufbrechen von TPM, SSL, staatliches Zurückhalten von sicherheitsrelevanten Bugs zwecks Hacking, [[wp:Pegasus_(spyware)|Pegasus]], [[wp:de:Staatstrojaner|Staatstrojaner]]<!--
Schlechtes Beispiel
, [[wp:XZ_Utils#Backdoor_incident|XZ Utils]] (staatlicher Akteur wird vermutet, wobei China als wahrscheinlichster Kandidat gehandelt wird)--> -- Geheimdienste geben Bugs in der Regel erst an die Öffentlichkeit, wenn für Regierungen und Volkswirtschaften größere Schäden absehbar sind.


Letztlich muss eine "wehrhafte Demokratie" sowohl konventionelle als auch hybride Angriffe - sei es interne oder externe - überleben können. Tut sie das nicht, war ihre Selbstverteidigung nicht stark genug.
==Brain Dump==
: "You can fool all people for some time.
: You can fool a few people for all time.
: But you cannot fool all people all the time." - Ein Community-Mitglied


==Zusammenfassung==
==Summary==
* Aufgrund von Eigendynamiken und Sicherheitsdilemmata (im Kontext von Separatisten und Syndikat (SOC)) herrscht innerhalb der WCG die Meinung vor auf ein Minimum an Propaganda und Zensur durch die TCTF (siehe "Scimon" Bertram) angewiesen zu sein. Trotz ihrer Macht hat die WCG zu viele Feinde.
* Due to its own dynamics and security dilemmas (in the context of Separatists and Syndicate (SOC)), the prevailing opinion within the WCG is to rely on a minimum of propaganda and censorship from the TCTF (see also "Scimon" Bertram). Despite its power, the WCG has too many enemies.
* Hasegawa und seine Frau könnten zum Teil Opfer einer gewissen Komplexität und von Delegitimiererpropaganda geworden sein?
* Hasegawa and his wife may have been partly victims of a certain complexity and delegitimizing propaganda?


[[Category:Oni 2]]
[[Category:Oni 2]]

Revision as of 20:38, 9 July 2024

"The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth." - Aldous Huxley, Brave New World (1932), from the foreword (1946)

Propaganda

Gleichschaltung

Censorship

Occurances in democracies

Propaganda in dictatorships is almost self-explanatory. The shades of gray in democracies and their reasons are much more interesting.

Propaganda, Gleichschaltung and censorship usually happen at the same time. In wartime autocracies, this is almost guaranteed.

In peacetime, there is no Gleichschaltung - at least in democracies. Propaganda and censorship usually only appear subliminally there. Transitions, in turn, can be fluid - just as a state (or a hypothetical WCG) can be a mixed form of democracy and autocracy (dictatorship): First of all, a incomplete and finally defective democracy. See also: Narco-state.

Like real conspiracies, large-scale cover-ups and the like - see Watergate - harsh propaganda and censorship are also possible in real democracies - but fortunately rare.

In order to help the state correct itself, representatives of the quality media also see themselves as "Vierte Fourth Estate".

Some governments, in turn, try to keep reporters on a short leash. See also: Embedded journalism. pool reporting, critically discussed in the documentation "Why We Fight" (2005)

Agenda-Setting

Levels sorted by relevance:

  • State propaganda by (state) media, influencing jurisprudence and education, obstructing/disparaging the opposition
    • Türkiye, Erdogan
    • USA, Trump
      • Inciting populism, spread of fake news and conspiracy theories. However, Trump's means of communication of choice were Twitter and Fox News.
      • Whistled back to the angry Mob at the Capitol too late. Since then, he has been using the lie about the stolen election.
      • Trump has already planned a political purge - Project 2025, Schedule F - for his second term in office and would probably accompany it with the Deep State narrative and renewed allusions to alleged anti-corruption. ("Draining the swamp in Washington.")
      • Imposed conservative constitutional judges Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
    • Poland, Kaczyński
    • Hungary, Orban
    • Italy, Berlusconi
  • Normal agenda setting (politics via media)
    • Propaganda Lite Edition: Populism
  • Some media companies’ own agenda setting:
    • Simply as an intention or supposedly as a correction to the competition's agenda.
    • This is partly a dynamic of its own:
      • Development of a certain team spirit (esprit de corps) as a subspectrum within the larger Left-Right-Spectrum.
      • Setting priorities through niche service. -- In general, the diverse political orientation and focus (the actual reasons for this put aside) is seen as an enrichment.
  • Attitude journalism -- Apparently some of the criticism of attitude journalism stems from a narrative on the right-wing spectrum. The setting of topics by progressive representatives is perceived as an attempt at paternalism or is defamed as such. This corresponds to AfD thought patterns. At the same time, some topics are not examined critically enough, so that preconceived opinions can shorten research. Claus Kleber also drew a mixed conclusion. -- The bottom line: The progressives are a little too uncritical when it comes to migration and integration and the conservatives are too hypersensitive when it comes to green issues.

Self-running dynamics

  • Hiding facts because of your own bias or bubble or "ideology".
  • Discrepancy: Public opinion differs somewhat from "published opinion". (Precht and Welzer)
  • Germany's minimal left-wing position, the symptom of which is the equation of the right with right-wing extremism. -- However, the AfD story about the "left-green filthy" ("linksgrünversiffte") "lying press" ("Lügenpresse") and the "opinion dictatorship" is again a massive exaggeration for the purpose of populist agitation.

Cancel Culture

In the Internet age, many state and public actors are afraid of digital shitstorms and waves of public outrage. The “interest representatives” can have political as well as purely economic motives.

Censorship for the purpose of diplomacy or protection of national "interests"

Supposition:

  • YouTube variant of ARTE documentation Battle for Airbus
  • Subsequent censorship of an archived broadcast in the media library that had previously been seen millions of times. The video link was only accessible when one knew what to search for. André Wüstner on ARD Tagesthemen: "And it's about us wanting to continue to live in peace and freedom. And anyone who doesn't understand that shouldn't at the moment bear political responsibility." - Context: The German Chancellor wanted to sweep the Taurus debate under the carpet those days. In addition, France and Germany presented a conflicted picture: A public exchange of verbal attacks. At the Weimar Triangle meeting, an attempt was made to show demonstrative unity again all the more.

Security dilemmas

  • Dealing with Whistleblowers. See: Snowden and Assange.
    • Despite all the mistakes now broken Assange has made in protecting sources, it would be a good thing for the democratic USA to show autocrat Putin the diplomatic middle finger and, in an act of humanity, stop the prosecution of Assange on the next anniversary of Navalny's death. -- Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, drafter and signer of the Declaration of Independence, Polymath: "Critics are our friends. They show us our faults." -- In July 2024, the US government and Assange agreed on a deal. However, a short time later, Biden's quasi pre-election campaign was overshadowed by debates about his age.

Tolerance paradox:

  • Censorship against increasing fake news from domestic and foreign actors.
    • Systematic exploitation of freedom of expression.
      • Individual statements can be based on the Basic Law. However, the situation changes when those statements are part of inflammatory propaganda or discriminatory ideology that despises people or the state. -- Or even contain hidden calls for violence. -- Haldenwang made a similar statement in the Maaßen case. In addition, the end of 2023 / beginning of 2024 was preceded by other events: parts of the German farmers' protests were infiltrated by lateral thinkers. (Some of these were in turn incited by right-wing extremists and Russian propaganda.) The ambush and intimidation of politicians was organized in chat groups. Requests peppered with seemingly harmless irony were enough: "ACHTUNG !! Robert Harbeck (sic!) lädt heute zum Bürgerdialog um 16:45 Uhr im Fährhafen Schlüttsiel ein ! Er wünscht sich unendlich viel Interesse. Tun wir ihm den Gefallen und kommen mit allem was Räder hat ! Heute 16:45 Uhr Schlüttsiel !!!!!!"
    • Democracies' own claim to be open makes them vulnerable: physically, economically, informationally. Open information and discussions can play into the hands of opponents of the system (autocracies). -- Freedom versus security is a recurring theme. Especially in the area of ​​cryptography. Please refer: Crypto Wars, TrueCrypt, active infiltration: breaking TPM, SSL, state withholding of security-relevant bugs for hacking, Pegasus, Staatstrojaner. -- Secret services usually only disclose bugs to the public when major damage to governments and economies is foreseeable.

Ultimately, a "defensive democracy" must be able to survive both conventional and hybrid attacks - be they internal or external. If it doesn't do that, its self-defense wasn't strong enough.

Brain Dump

"You can fool all people for some time.
You can fool a few people for all time.
But you cannot fool all people all the time." - Ein Community-Mitglied

Summary

  • Due to its own dynamics and security dilemmas (in the context of Separatists and Syndicate (SOC)), the prevailing opinion within the WCG is to rely on a minimum of propaganda and censorship from the TCTF (see also "Scimon" Bertram). Despite its power, the WCG has too many enemies.
  • Hasegawa and his wife may have been partly victims of a certain complexity and delegitimizing propaganda?