Talk:Crescent Moon Kick: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(pragmatism not idealism) |
(It's not EZ being OC) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:That's the way it's been with all the systematic databases so far. When I set them up in a highly organized way, I know I can't really rely on a timely "group effort", and that I should be ready to wrap up the thing all by myself, and within a very short time frame. Such a scope helps keep my commitments modest. | :That's the way it's been with all the systematic databases so far. When I set them up in a highly organized way, I know I can't really rely on a timely "group effort", and that I should be ready to wrap up the thing all by myself, and within a very short time frame. Such a scope helps keep my commitments modest. | ||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 18:30, 21 March 2008 (CET) | ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 18:30, 21 March 2008 (CET) | ||
:::"that's borderline obsessive-compulsive." Now you're catching on. Let's just say that Monk has nothing on me. | |||
:::But I see what you're saying, and using Categories to lump together all move pages will satisfy my urge to organize, organize, organize. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 19:09, 21 March 2008 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 18:09, 21 March 2008
geyser, are you sure we shouldn't be putting the move pages under Gameplay/Combat moves? --Iritscen 15:50, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- I think named moves will be just fine on a global level. We can always move them Later(TM). --geyser 16:03, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- And to think of it, the combat move database hardly fits as a subpage of Gameplay, too. --geyser 16:09, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- ↑This is true. I actually just want consistency; using subpages was never a habit of mine until I saw how frequently they were used here. I really am a Boolean kind of person, as I would rather see (virtually) no subpages, or else subpages everywhere, organizing everything. So I was proposing something in line with the fact that most pages are already subpages. Oh well. I will create other move pages without hierarchy, then. We can decide what to do with them later; maybe just unify them under one category. --Iritscen 16:46, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- And to think of it, the combat move database hardly fits as a subpage of Gameplay, too. --geyser 16:09, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- The wiki is not as tidy as Wikipedia, granted. But please try not to be "a Boolean kind of person" if you don't want to be part of the problem ^_^ Letting personal preferences guide the design of a single page is OK, but seeking out stuff to "consistencize" wiki-wide... that's borderline obsessive-compulsive.
- Sorry for the rant, and BTW, yeah, pages at root level and categories FTW. The lack of a standardized/systematic layout encourages casual contribution. If you set up a big-ass frame for new content with lots of strict-ass guidelines there's a good chance you'll be the only one who'll be willing to play along...
- That's the way it's been with all the systematic databases so far. When I set them up in a highly organized way, I know I can't really rely on a timely "group effort", and that I should be ready to wrap up the thing all by myself, and within a very short time frame. Such a scope helps keep my commitments modest.
- geyser 18:30, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- "that's borderline obsessive-compulsive." Now you're catching on. Let's just say that Monk has nothing on me.
- But I see what you're saying, and using Categories to lump together all move pages will satisfy my urge to organize, organize, organize. --Iritscen 19:09, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- geyser 18:30, 21 March 2008 (CET)