8,018
edits
m (→SFPS / META (2056): ach, noch was) |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (reply) |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
<u>[ ideas how the DC could work ]</u><br> | <u>[ ideas how the DC could work ]</u><br> | ||
(A, G, C can transform by mutagens) | (A, G, C can transform by mutagens) | ||
Adenine becomes Hypoxanthin | Adenine becomes Hypoxanthin <font color="#777">(Hypoxanthine is used in the [[wikipedia:Wobble_base_pair|Wobble base pair]] by [[wikipedia:Inosine|Inosine]].</font> | ||
Guanine becomes Xanthin | Guanine becomes Xanthin | ||
Cytosine becomes Uracile<br> | Cytosine becomes Uracile<br> | ||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
On the other hand the two types (DNA and RNA) still exist - there is <u>not</u> the one ultimate <u>remaining</u>. | On the other hand the two types (DNA and RNA) still exist - there is <u>not</u> the one ultimate <u>remaining</u>. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
ACGT gives 4<sup>3</sup> (= 64) combinations, but 20 of them are used only. Would it makes sense that the Daodan use more? | <strike>ACGT gives 4<sup>3</sup> (= 64) combinations, but 20 of them are used only. Would it makes sense that the Daodan use more? | ||
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:NichtGenMenge.png DNA amount, that doesn't encode proteins (picture).] [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genom#Bemerkungen Genome Article)] | [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:NichtGenMenge.png DNA amount, that doesn't encode proteins (picture).] [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genom#Bemerkungen Genome Article)] | ||
They are supposed of having a control function of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_expression gene expression]. | They are supposed of having a control function of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_expression gene expression]. | ||
The DC might gives new functions by use the other 44 combination in non-protein code.<br><br> | The DC might gives new functions by use the other 44 combination in non-protein code.</strike><br><br> | ||
<u>[ ideas what the DC could be ]</u><br> | <u>[ ideas what the DC could be ]</u><br> | ||
My first thought was that the DC is just an upgrade construction and cannot exist without a host construction, the DNA. | My first thought was that the DC is just an upgrade construction and cannot exist without a host construction, the DNA. | ||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
:It's totally possible that the [[Daodan]] generates completely new proteins. | :It's totally possible that the [[Daodan]] generates completely new proteins. | ||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 22:26, 1 October 2007 (CEST) | ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 22:26, 1 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
:Yes, my mistake, and thank you for correction. | |||
:Those redundances create [[wikipedia:Codon#Degeneracy_of_the_genetic_code|degeneray of the genetic code]] but seem to a little effect nonetheless. "Recent results suggest that silent mutations can have an effect on subsequent protein structure and activity." [[wikipedia:Silent_mutation|<nowiki>[< source]</nowiki>]] | |||
::[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 13:20, 3 October 2007 (CEST) | |||
;"So, maybe this is what Daodan's regeneration and mutation skill speeds up." | ;"So, maybe this is what Daodan's regeneration and mutation skill speeds up." | ||
:The [[Daodan]] is very much like [[wikipedia:Cancer|cancer]]: aggression, invasion, metastasis... | :The [[Daodan]] is very much like [[wikipedia:Cancer|cancer]]: aggression, invasion, metastasis... | ||
Line 132: | Line 135: | ||
:But the appearance and function of the cell are ''dramatically'' repurposed. | :But the appearance and function of the cell are ''dramatically'' repurposed. | ||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 22:26, 1 October 2007 (CEST) | ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 22:26, 1 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
:Yea, daodan-material enclosed by a virus hull is not bad for the first host-wide infection and (thus developed) "smart cancers" have a great regeneration potential. | |||
::[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 13:20, 3 October 2007 (CEST) | |||
;"Or is it possible that the Daodan-Chrysalis is more like a organelle?" | ;"Or is it possible that the Daodan-Chrysalis is more like a organelle?" | ||
:Have a look [http://qntm.org/questions HERE], more specifically at point 3. And then relax. | :Have a look [http://qntm.org/questions HERE], more specifically at point 3. And then relax. | ||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 00:12, 2 October 2007 (CEST) | ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 00:12, 2 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
:IMO, on one point, science fiction creates big interest when it looks very possible for the future. | |||
:But I agree with you again. The story comes first. <u>So, ignore the grey box here as something of my personal interest.</u> =) | |||
::[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 13:20, 3 October 2007 (CEST) | |||
===GOP=== | ===GOP=== |
edits