8,013
edits
Talk:Trivia: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (hmm) |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::::: ''Du darfst/solltest dieses Kind nicht verhätscheln und somit sein Egoismus.'' | ::::: ''Du darfst/solltest dieses Kind nicht verhätscheln und somit sein Egoismus.'' | ||
::::: Note that pamper refers to child and selfishness - a second verb was spared, so try to see it more metaphor-like / as "stylistic device". | ::::: Note that pamper refers to child and selfishness - a second verb was spared, so try to see it more metaphor-like / as "stylistic device" (*). | ||
::::: If you mean "must not" ("darfst nicht"), ok, it might not be perfect here, "shouldn't" ("solltest nicht") would fit better. But there was no other references so it might be (a bit or totally) wrong in first place (but the document seems reliable)). --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 22: | ::::: If you mean "must not" ("darfst nicht"), ok, it might not be perfect here, "shouldn't" ("solltest nicht") would fit better. But there was no other references so it might be (a bit or totally) wrong in first place (but the document seems reliable)). | ||
::::: ____ | |||
::::: Edit after seeing Iritscen reply: I see, my English is still lacking like hell. -- How about this: "You must not pamper this child so that selfishness (*)(will result)!" ? --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 22:14, 31 March 2008 (CEST) | |||